| An apple pie from scratch $\succ$ Outline $\succ$ Drawing arrows and coding functions |
Here is an outline structure (work in progress):
Eventually, make a list of mutually properly distinct physical frameworks - i.e. mathematical theories used in physics, usually coming with some state space and dynamics, see Perspective. In the latter sense, they must be exhaustively specified, of course, together with a concise list of their respective axioms. Some frameworks contain black boxes that are further given insight into in more detailed theories. Here, when it comes to physics, I tend to like to have the rougher theories first.
| 'that list' |
Now one can reference real life systems and associate mathematical models in this and that framework with them. Develop them like this:
| mechanics |
todo: examples of experiments
| … phenomenological thermodynamics |
todo: examples of experiments
(Phenomenological thermodynamics leads to a lot of basic chemistry)
| electronics |
todo: examples of experiments
| electromagnetic field theory |
| Preface |
|---|
| An apple pie from scratch |
| Guideline |
| Outline (this entry) |
Logical prerequisites
| Meta |
|---|
| On syntax |
| Symbols |
| Types, terms and programming |
| up to dependent type theory (?MLTT, etc.) |
| type of natural numbers |
| type of categories |
| informal Curry-Howard correspondence |
| Foundational temp1 |
| Formal logic |
| Intuitionistic logic (independent of type theory) |
| First order logic (i.e. adding LEM to Intuitionistic logic) |
| Axioms for set theory (e.g. GT-set-theory, and then U= type of sets) |
Mathematical core
todo: the following line of “apple pie from scratch” entries have some gaps
I have neither been able to find a good n-category basis instead of the 1-category approach I take here
nor have I formalized “up to iso” anywhere (this point is relate to the one above)
| Formal part |
|---|
| On category theory basics |
| On universal morphisms |
| Foundational temp3 |
| Foundational temp4 |
| … |
| … mathematics of statistical physics |
| On universal morphisms |